NY Assembly Looks At Millionaire's Tax

N.Y. Assembly Looks at Millionaire's Tax

Updated: Wednesday, 26 May 2010, 6:44 PM EDT
Published : Wednesday, 26 May 2010, 1:53 PM EDT

    MYFOXNY.COM STAFF REPORT

    MYFOXNY.COM - New York Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver is reportedly pitching a plan for an increased "millionaire's tax" aimed at 75-85 thousand New Yorkers making $1 million or more a year.

    Political columnist Fred Dicker , who appeared on Wednesday's Good Day New York, says Silver secretly proposed a $1 billion tax hike on the highest income earners to Gov. Paterson.

    The plan would jack up a current millionaires tax another 11-percent. The current "millionaire's tax" actually starts affecting people who have incomes over $200,000. High income tax earners would pay more than 13-percent of their salary in local taxes.

    The highest one percent of income earners account for about 36 percent of all state taxes.

    The state is trying to close a $9.2 billion deficit.

    Governor Paterson approved a plan that would furlough 100,000 state workers one day a week for eight weeks, which would save $30 million a week for the state. A judge blocked that temporarily blocked that plan at a union's request.  A hearing was scheduled for Wednesday afternoon to review Paterson's plan.

    This "Millionaire's Tax" actually goes after anyone who earns more than $200,000 in a year. Unbelievable. This is nothing short of legalized robbery.

    Arizona to eliminate speed cameras on highways

    PHOENIX – Arizona is ending a groundbreaking and contentious program that put speed cameras along Phoenix-area freeways and in vans deployed across the state.

    Opponents have argued the cameras open the door for wider "Big Brother" surveillance and are more about making money than safety. The program has been the target of an initiative measure proposed for the November ballot.

    Even Gov. Jan Brewer has said she doesn't like the cameras, and her intention to end the program was first disclosed in her January budget proposal. That was followed by a non-renewal letter sent by the Arizona Department of Public Safety this week to the private company that runs the program.

    Scottsdale-based Redflex said Thursday that the 36 fixed cameras will be turned off and the 40 vans taken off highways on July 16, the day after its state contract expires.

    The non-renewal letter was first reported by The Arizona Republic.

    The camera program was instituted by Brewer's predecessor, Janet Napolitano, now the Homeland Security secretary. Cameras were introduced in September 2008 and were added until all 76 were up and running by January 2009.

    Lawmakers considered repeal proposals within months, but set the issue aside and appealed for calmer debate when a passing motorist fatally shot a camera-van operator doing paperwork in his marked vehicle in April 2009.

    The mobile and fixed cameras snap the photos of speeders going 11 mph or over the speed limit, and violators get tickets in the mail. Supporters said the cameras slow down drivers, reduce accidents, and free up law-enforcement officers for serious criminals.

    Napolitano estimated that the program would bring in $90 million revenue in its first year, but actual revenue fell far short as many motorists ignored notices received in the mail.

    While hundreds of jurisdictions across the country use speed cameras and some states have limited programs using cameras in certain areas, Arizona's statewide deployment remained the widest state use of the technology.

    The state's decision is a setback for supporters of speed-enforcement cameras, said Jonathan Adkins, a spokesman for the Washington-based Governors Highway Safety Association.

    "We need to look and see what happened in Arizona why didn't it work," he said.

    Shawn Dow, a leader of the initiative campaign, welcomed the decision to end the program but said the drive's organizers still plan to file petition signatures on the July 1 deadline to qualify it for the November ballot.

    The end of the state program does not affect local governments' use of cameras for speed enforcement, but the proposed ballot measure would prohibit state and local governments from using cameras for both speed violations and red-light running.

    Redflex, a unit of Australia-based Redflex Holdings Ltd., said in a disclosure to the Australian Securities Exchange that it could write off $5 million of assets because of the program's end. Under the state's contract, Redflex supplies cameras, vans and other equipment.

    Department of Public Safety officials declined to comment on the contract or to immediately release the letter. Redflex quoted the letter as saying the non-renewal reflected "a change in the agency's focus."

    The end of the program will be a disappointment, Redflex spokeswoman Shoba Vaitheeswaran said. She said it comes as the program continued to mature, with improvements being made in court processing procedures and other areas.

    Arizona lawmakers approved legislation this year that imposes new signage requirements and other changes for the program.

    Joanna Peters, a Phoenix traffic-safety activist, called the Brewer administration's decision irresponsible.

    "They're ignoring a silent majority of folks who actually support the program," Peters said. "This is something we could fix, not just throw out the baby."

    ___

    On the Net:

    Photo-enforcement program: http://www.azdps.gov/Services/Photo_Enforcement/

    Redflex: http://www.redflex.com/

    CameraFRAUD: http://camerafraud.wordpress.com/

    I'm really excited to hear this statewide test didn't go well. Between the new immigration law and the elimination of speed cameras, I think I may be hanging out Arizona a lot more in the future! I love Arizona!!

    Rep. Jose E. Serrano D-NY thinks that Arizona is discriminating against 40% of a race. That doesn't even make sense.

    Arizona Immigration Law Could Cost State Major League Baseball's All-Star Game; Some Push Boycotts - ABC News

    Arizona's passage of a controversial anti-immigration law could cost the state Major League Baseball's All-Star Game, potentially depriving an already battered economy of millions of dollars.

    ...

    "I think that when people, states, localities make decisions this monumental, they should know the full consequence of that decision," Rep. José E. Serrano, D-N.Y., said. "I think Major League Baseball, with 40 percent Latino ballplayers at all levels, should make a statement that it will not hold its All-Star Game in a state that discriminates against 40 percent of their people."

    You are either discriminatory toward a race or you are not discriminatory toward a race. The bill discriminates against illegal aliens, not Mexicans. You can't discriminate against 40% of a race.

    This statement by Serrano shows just how incompetent this guy is. Progressives are so good at pulling the race card, but it's to the point where they just sound like they don't know what they're talking about.